In the case of Rome, Machiavelli says that even though the
city was originally established as a kingdom, fortune and chance allowed it to
transition to a state that had at least two of the three required
representative constituents present: the two consuls who stood for royal
authority and the aristocratic senate. All that was left was access by the
people, the democratic element of government. This would be accomplished by the
creation of the tribunes of the plebeians.
The process of political transition is not without its
troubles, and most people would rather not acknowledge that the three separate
factions do not always share similar interests or have identical desires.
Political life, though, is part of the life of men, and men, so says
Machiavelli, are evil creatures who will always seek to act cruelly to others
if given the chance. Rulers who seek to found cities and political associations,
not to mention political philosophers who wish to remake the world according to
their pet theories, ignore this at their own peril.
This inherent evil in man is what necessitates the representation
of each faction within the city. When Rome was no longer ruled by the Tarquins,
the unchecked aristocratic class, which no longer needed to fear an alliance
between the king and the people, began to abuse their authority over the
plebeians. The tribunes were birthed from the conflict between these two
classes, and Machiavelli recognizes that these conflicts, rather than creating
total disharmony or anarchy, helped hold together a relatively stable political
order for three centuries. The evil of men combined with the disparate interests
of each class, with no faction going completely unrestrained, created conditions
favorable to liberty.
Nicely said.
ReplyDeleteMakes me want to read Coriolanus again.